<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Apologetics Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apologeticsreview.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com</link>
	<description>Evaluating the world of Christian/non-Christian dialogue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:20:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Anthropic Principle Stated &#8211; from 1833 !</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/03/16/the-anthropic-principle-stated-from-1833/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/03/16/the-anthropic-principle-stated-from-1833/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christian apologists are surely aware of the modern Anthropic Principle, a phrase first popularized by Barrow and Tipler&#8217;s 1988 work, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford University Press. The &#8220;strong form&#8221; of the insight addresses the values of the fundamental constants of physics. Scientists such as Robert H. Dicke, Fred Hoyle, John Gribbin, Martin Rees, Paul [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/03/16/the-anthropic-principle-stated-from-1833/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malthusian Apologetics &#8211; Who Knew?</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/29/malthusian-apologetics-who-knew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/29/malthusian-apologetics-who-knew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course you know this most famous work by Thomas Robert Malthus &#8211; An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798). It is still discussed today among social theorists, Marxists and academicians. Charles Darwin credits his first insight into natural selection as inspired by his reading of Malthus. In addition, Malthus scores Christian apologetics points [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/29/malthusian-apologetics-who-knew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Pilgrim’s Regress: George John Romanes and the Search for Rational Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/20/a-pilgrims-regress-george-john-romanes-and-the-search-for-rational-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/20/a-pilgrims-regress-george-john-romanes-and-the-search-for-rational-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I present to you this wonderful account of a faith lost, then regained. We owe a debt of gratitude to Dr. Timothy McGrew for bringing the story of George Romanes back to light. Dr. McGrew is the founder of &#8220;The Library of Historical Apologetics,&#8221; an effort at &#8220;Rediscovering Forgotten Defenders of the Faith.&#8221; Wikipedia opens [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/20/a-pilgrims-regress-george-john-romanes-and-the-search-for-rational-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons from Bertrand Russell &#8211; by way of his daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/18/lessons-from-bertrand-russell-by-way-of-his-daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/18/lessons-from-bertrand-russell-by-way-of-his-daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the pantheon of world-famous atheists of the 20th century we must admit two of the most intellectual were Anthony Flew and Bertrand Russell. Both were trained in philosophy from Britain&#8217;s best universities. Dr. Flew studied at Oxford while Russell was a Cambridge man. Flew renounced his atheism and Russell remained steadfast in his unbelief [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/18/lessons-from-bertrand-russell-by-way-of-his-daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D&#8217;Souza &#8211; Ehrman Debate on the Problem of Evil coming to NYC March 5th, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/01/dsouza-ehrman-debate-on-the-problem-of-evil-coming-to-nyc-march-5th-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/01/dsouza-ehrman-debate-on-the-problem-of-evil-coming-to-nyc-march-5th-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; File this under &#8220;I&#8217;ve Got to Go to This&#8221;. March 5th, 7PM at the New York Society for Ethical Culture (D&#8217;Souza debated Hitchens here a few years ago). The topic is &#8220;God, Suffering and Evil&#8221; and will be moderated by Eric Metaxas. D&#8217;Souza and Ehrman have debated this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/02/01/dsouza-ehrman-debate-on-the-problem-of-evil-coming-to-nyc-march-5th-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Silence is Maddening &#8211; or, Where is Everybody?</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/15/the-silence-is-maddening-or-where-is-everybody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/15/the-silence-is-maddening-or-where-is-everybody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a techno-nerd, I frequent sites like Engadget and Gizmodo. So, imagine my surprise when I spied this recent headline from Gizmodo: &#8220;The Possibility of Alien Life Is Now (Almost) Impossible to Deny.&#8221; Hmmm&#8230; Zat&#8217;s so? Now just what sort of evidence would lead to such a compelling conclusion? Seems it boils down pretty much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/15/the-silence-is-maddening-or-where-is-everybody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little post-Christian honesty</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/03/a-little-post-christian-honesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/03/a-little-post-christian-honesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a firm believer that faith lost can become faith regained. If that makes me an outcast at the latest Calvinist Meet-up then so be it. The Scriptures are unambiguously clear on this. In any event, I&#8217;ve been reading stories from those who lost their faith and then reflected upon what it&#8217;s meant to them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2012/01/03/a-little-post-christian-honesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stalin&#8217;s Daughter Dies &#8211; but not without an important message</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/29/stalins-daughter-dies-but-not-without-an-important-message/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/29/stalins-daughter-dies-but-not-without-an-important-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Josef Stalin had a daughter, Svetlana Iosifovna Alliluyeva. And two sons. One son was captured by the Nazis in 1941 and died in a concentration camp. The other son died an alcoholic at age 40. Svetlana defected to the United States in 1967. Her father had served 12 years as Premier of the Soviet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/29/stalins-daughter-dies-but-not-without-an-important-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Grace Effect: How the Power of One Life Can Reverse the Corruption of Unbelief</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/26/the-grace-effect-how-the-power-of-one-life-can-reverse-the-corruption-of-unbelief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/26/the-grace-effect-how-the-power-of-one-life-can-reverse-the-corruption-of-unbelief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s &#8220;hard apologetics&#8221; where we engage the merits of philosophical, scientific and Biblical issues head-on. Then, there&#8217;s &#8220;soft apologetics&#8221; where life itself dictates the issues and nudges us toward reality. This book falls into the &#8220;soft apologetics&#8221; category. Larry Taunton is the Founder and Director of the Fixed-Point Foundation, a non-profit dedicated to the public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/11/26/the-grace-effect-how-the-power-of-one-life-can-reverse-the-corruption-of-unbelief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins&#8217;s refusal to debate Craig embarrasses even some of his fellow atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/10/24/dawkinss-refusal-to-debate-craig-embarrasses-even-some-of-his-fellow-atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/10/24/dawkinss-refusal-to-debate-craig-embarrasses-even-some-of-his-fellow-atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apologeticsreview.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even Richard Dawkins&#8217;s fellow atheists get it. Dawkins&#8217;s condescending tone dismissing Craig as an unheard-of philosopher is hardly credible, given the notable fellow-atheists Craig has debated in recent years (Christopher Hitchens, A.C. Grayling, Lewis Wolpert, Peter Atkins, Shelly Kagan, Lawrence Krauss, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, just to name a few). Either he has not been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.apologeticsreview.com/2011/10/24/dawkinss-refusal-to-debate-craig-embarrasses-even-some-of-his-fellow-atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

